Thanks Fuzzydude. Are you saying that Steinberg will start offering a trial period for Cubase Pro 9 starting in about a month?
That will be great to explore it before I commit to buying. Thanks for your help. Its always a couple months after so defnitely worth waiting. Personally, I went back from Nuendo 6. In my opinion, the handful of great new features isn't worth the hassle which the newly designed mixer page gives me.
I'm used to work with mouse and keyboard shortcuts a lot; the mixer of Cubase 7. They are able to walk out my studio minutes after the last audio is captured with a near finalized mix of their material. Now I know my experience makes that possible but alot comes from steinberg focusing on making quality software thats very user friendly. Now if you are looking for a program with a high resolution sound engine, pristine cpu power in your plugintry yes i made that up , and mapping and bussing that will literally make you verbally abuse your setup repeatedly then PT is for you.
Its idealogy to be used with gear. If youve got an icon or SSL, hell even a AWS 94 or any analog board of comparison protools will seem easy because your board interfaces and whatever you touch corresponds. Not click bussing or drawing automation. You get all that special power at your finger tips. Evan my tascam integrates with PT very well and allows me more flexibility then using a mouse.
So in conclusion: Cubase: fast editing, quicker routing, seems more plugin and midi friendly, and easy on the brain. PT: Industry depth in sound, more power out of your plugins and mix, if you have the new 10 you can maximize headroom with the new 32bit engine.
Greatly compatible with interface board. But here is why I said "neither but both" Lets look at these two notable entities as Beyonce and Jay Z I will let you pick which is which. Before they teamed up they were arguably the best in their genres arguably meaning there were other singers and rappers mentionable but it wasn't until they becamevunited when Beyonce became the queen of RnB and JayZ secured his legendary image as one of the greatest in hiphop.
Now who can actually argue that B is better then J or vice versa? You cant because they're different in style and genre. But put them together and you get one hell of a combo! And that is why I say both And then it hit me! Do my recording and editing in cubase using the seamless workspace features, but then mix and master the trax in PT especially with that new 32bit engine which makes it nearly impossible to clip audio.
The epiphany of using both for what they do best has been gold for me literally. Granted its a few more steps to take wether you. OMF out or mixdown to a 32bit stereo track, it gets the job done and ive had no complaints in the past year I have been using this combination In fact Ive expanded on my business. Kainer New member. The sound is the same and it is called pro tools from PROduction tools. The OP himself said he stayed with Cubase cause the hardware implementation is easier for him in Cubase.
Cubase is 64 bit btw. So why you think 32 bit of PT10 would be better? Nice workflow when you are nearly ready with mixing the song after the client recorded it. Forum lied to me and told me this was a new thread MLHStudiosInc said:. Now if you are looking for a program with a high resolution sound engine , pristine cpu power in your plugintry yes i made that up , and mapping and bussing that will literally make you verbally abuse your setup repeatedly then PT is for you.
Gee whiz Mo Facta went in on me lol. Listen I know cubase has been capable of that stuff for a while and hey im a Cubase over Pro Tools guy myself. I was giving my personal opinion based off what has come to work for me. Especially giving the fact like some one stated in the thread earlier Pro Tools is the industry standard simply because it latched on first. I personally think Cubase has been surpassed them but my method is a technique of using cubase to capture and tweak audio freely but using PT to polish audio according to industry standard.
And agreeing with you I stated neither is best and both are great! And Im not pushing my levels that hard by preference. But I deal with alot of rap and pop music which they prefer jacked up to the maximum for punch and volume.
But I agree with aortizjr here that Cubase after all is the winner in the long run. And the reason in short is basically that Cubase has the most functions and where-they-should-be from a users perspective. So always have as a routine to rename and save often!!! Well, I'm a sucker for variation so I tend to torture my system with loads of plugins and hardly ever use the same effect on any track, so I'm aware that's my own fault To skip any of these DAWs is not an option though for me.
Here's a starter vid It works more like PT for editing than like Cubase with it's layers being analogous to PT's playlists. It's a much stronger editor than people think, but you have to dig into the key commands for some of the additional power.
I didnt get on with Studio One artist' which I bought early on. Was a diehard Sonar user till 8. I had already been playing around with Reaper and decided to switch. One excellent comment earlier - if you ave invested a ton of time and effort in a DAW, it is wise to make very sure you are ready for the learning curve you WILL experience moving to something new.
My workflow went to hell and gone initially in every "new" DAW I tried - in fact Reaper was probably the worst in this respect, because it approached a lot of the audio recording and editing tasks in a very different way. Fortunately I stuck with it doing yer basic audio recording and editing is a breeze straight away, so dont panic and have found that in most cases the Reaper way works out either easier, better, or both.
Not wishing to sound like a fanboi, as I still hv issues that need resolving with certain aspects of Reaper, but it is SO stable.
The only crash I have had with it was when I downloaded a free VST tht just didnt want to play with reaper. Oh and FWIW I tried Mixcraft for a while and loved the easiness, but of course that was also its downfall ultimately for me.
Super little app if all you want to do is basic loopy or audio recordings. The performance hit you are talking about using Cubase with the Mac has been confirmed by others, but so have the other DAWs too to a lesser extent. Just using Windows 7 will improve that across the board.
I'd start by switching computers and running Windows 7 but getting the band together more often for practice sounds like it will do the most good and that's basically free. AJ Reynolds. I have to say that, after the last week of working exclusively in S1V2, I don't miss anything out of Cubendo except for a dedicated drum editor. Presonus has really stepped up to the plate. In my experience, VariAudio pretty much sucks.
NO comparison to Melodyne in quality and feature set. Don't know how the 'pros' hacked working on that all these years when Nuendo was available!! I absolutely love it It's instant as can be, with only a few minor downsides. Works great here too for timing and pitch correction I wouldn't know about serious re-pitching as I don't need it for more than a little tweaking - not like melodyne isn't usable in Cubase anyway?
I haven't used the others, but I really like Studio One. Also, think outside the box, take a look at DP or something else. There is way less control over the manipulation of the audio in VariAudio. And, while I can't speak to your experiences, I find it hard to believe anyone could find it more transparent. Main point is you get full blown VariAudio Pitch Correction in Cubase built in with no additional purchase. The other poster was acting as if this was left out of Cubase, its not.
You may not dig it but it works fine here. But some features in Cubase are really handy and time savers. I love both. As for Variaudio, I don't think it sounds good at all on male vox, as soon as variaudio is engaged the audio distords. For example, the 'sss' become 'shh', so 'snake' becomes 'shnake', you need to cut after the 's' and move only the 'nake' part.
But the fact that's built in cubase makes it really handy and simple to use. John T. I prefer Cubase on several levels, many of which have already been mentioned. But, I enjoy working with both DAWs. Pro tool and Cubase both are digital audio works stations and deals with editing as well as the mastering of audio tracks, sound and music as well, in their own working manner.
I will tell you about a basic characteristic of both software first. So what are you waiting for? Let us get started. Start Your Free Design Course. Now you have enough basic data in context with Pro Tools and Cubase and you can use these details for analyzing both of the software.
Now let us move to another section of this software to delve into both of the software. This section will brief you on some other important details of Pro tools and Cubase for extracting more information about them.
These details will go through Price or how to have them, working ability or method of them and so on. So without wasting your time let us have a look at these facts.
0コメント